• Digital Bolex D16 ready to order
  • Digital Bolex/Kish Series 1 Primes Now Available
  • D16 1TB. Rock for more than 3 hours in 2K.
  • D16M Monochrome: The world's most affordable black and white cinema camera
  • F&V Products in stock in the Digital Bolex Store
  • Professional PL Mount by Hot Rod Cameras
  • International Shipping Available

Please consider registering
guest

Log In Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —


— Match —


— Forum Options —


Minimum search word length is 4 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Topic RSS
2K- Good enough for Roger Deakins ASC
Topic Rating: 0 (0 votes) 
September 11, 2012
9:41 am
Ari Davidson

Camera Owner

Kickstarter Backer
Forum Posts: 385
Member Since:
March 17, 2012
Offline
September 11, 2012
11:10 am
joerubinstein

Camera Owner
Forum Posts: 1794
Member Since:
February 28, 2012
Offline
2
0

Seeing those two guys sitting next to each other on stage is so cool!

September 11, 2012
6:48 pm
Razz16mm
Guru
Forum Posts: 1659
Member Since:
March 27, 2012
Offline
3
0

Arriflex supports the move toward higher resolution too. 4k is the emerging gold standard for theatrical release. Every major chain in my hometown switched to 4k digital last fall. 36 screens.
2k is good, but not good enough to replace film.
http://www.efilm.com/publish/2.....20plus.pdf

September 13, 2012
12:25 am
DVCinLV
Member
Forum Posts: 477
Member Since:
April 10, 2012
Offline

Good enough to replace 16mm and S16 and early 35mm stock. Hence, a Bolex.Laugh

Having been shooting with JVC's QuadHD camcorder, I notice FullHD productions are free of video's typical edge sharpness and no artifacts. Essentially it is oversampling by 2X -- which a 2.5K camera can't do.

To get modern 35mm film stock -- or 4K projection -- we need 4K which means a 6K to 8K camera. That's why RED and Sony F65 are what they are.

All of the 2K to 2.5K are steps on the way to 4K needed to provide FullHD. To replace 35mm film, we are a long way from that with 2K to 2.5K cameras. These are for making BD or broadcast HD where you don't want a "video" look because they look SOFT.

Folks mistake softness for looking like "film" when, in fact, modern 35 film stock is not soft. But, if it works for you -- great!

PS: I've been shooting film and what you get is grain which the 2K to 2.5K cameras lack. Adding a slight bit of grain in post should get a good emulation of S16.

Forum Timezone: America/Los_Angeles

Most Users Ever Online: 122

Currently Online: iaremrsir, etrimat
17 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

Razz16mm: 1659

wado1942: 1122

pask74: 863

Thyl: 811

James M: 610

iaremrsir: 522

DVCinLV: 477

Harry Lime: 462

Ari Davidson: 385

analoggab: 376

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 1

Members: 2651

Moderators: 0

Admins: 3

Forum Stats:

Groups: 1

Forums: 8

Topics: 1035

Posts: 13659

Newest Members: benperry76, Debbie, vonny, cfordfilm, Timlangfordfilm, Eric Latek, rongz007, ashassard, Orson Cronenberg, rappamber

Administrators: StenRidley: 6, elleschneider: 74, joerubinstein: 1794